First-edition Book of Mormon stolen in Mesa
Hmmm ... I thought those religious folks always said they were more honest and ethical
then us non-believers???
Source
First-edition Book of Mormon stolen in Mesa
by Jim Walsh - May. 30, 2012 11:47 PM
The Republic | azcentral.com
For years, Mormon missionaries would come to Helen Schlie's bookstore near the Mesa Arizona Temple to have their pictures taken with a first-edition copy of the Book of Mormon.
Some missionaries would cry as they touched the rare book, one of 5,000 printed in 1830 after Joseph Smith found the gold plates that he translated into the Book of Mormon, which members of the faith consider to be scripture alongside the Bible.
"I tell people they are sharing their DNA with Joseph Smith himself," said Schlie, 88, a Mormon convert who bought the book in the late 1960s from a man so desperate for money that he was willing to sell a family heirloom.
Sometime over the Memorial Day weekend the book was stolen from Schlie's crowded shop, Rare and Out of Print Books and Art, and now it is Schlie who is desperate to get it back.
When she discovered the book was missing Monday, "it really hurt my heart," Schlie said. "I'm hoping someone will bring it back, let it finish its mission."
Mesa police Sgt. Tony Landato confirmed that Schlie reported the theft about 3 p.m. on Memorial Day and said a detective has been assigned to investigate.
"Certainly, it is someone who had access and knowledge of it," Landato said.
Schlie said the fact that she owned an original Book of Mormon was well-known within the Mormon community in the Valley and that hundreds of people have stopped by the bookstore, which more resembles a storeroom filled with stacks of books, to see it.
Schlie said she discovered the theft when two young women, Mormon missionaries from Asia, stopped by about 1 p.m. Monday to have their pictures taken with the book.
The last time Schlie and her assistant, Ken Hankins, saw the book was at 7 p.m. Friday, when they placed it in a fireproof box and set that in an unlocked filing cabinet.
No one asked to see the book Saturday, and the store was closed Sunday.
Hankins said he lives at the store, describing himself as a struggling artist and Schlie's "night watchman and chief bottle washer." He said he is very security-conscious.
Schlie valued the book at $100,000 when she reported it stolen. She said the book was not insured.
In 2005, Schlie became somewhat of a controversial figure among members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints when she announced plans to sell pages from the book for $2,500 to $4,000 apiece. She estimated she has sold 40 of the book's 588 pages, each mounted in a wooden frame.
Some critics consider divvying up the book as sacrilegious or disrespectful of its history. But Schlie and one of her customers, Gary Hyde, a winter resident of Mesa, said the LDS Church gave its blessing to the project, viewing it as a way of strengthening people's faith.
Hyde said his page is an effective teaching tool in his missionary work, which is appropriate because his page contains a passage about the importance of missionary work.
"Oh my goodness," said Hyde, when he learned about the theft. He said that grasping the book at Schlie's store was a very personal and powerful religious experience for many people.
"Just to have it in their hands brings a little bit of inspiration to them," Hyde said. "This is one of the original Books of Mormon, and they feel the spirit."
Although the book is now missing, the pages that Schlie sold are still touching many people, he said.
"I use it in various testimonies. I put the page to good work," Hyde said.
Cindy Packard, an LDS spokeswoman in the Valley, said she had no comment on the theft, but that the Book of Mormon is considered to be another testimony of Jesus Christ by church members and has equal standing with the Bible.
David LeSueur, another church spokesman, said in statement, "I hope whoever took it reads it, ponders it carefully and returns it."
Grace Community Church wants $2.47 million in government welfare!
Grace Community Church wants $300,000 in government welfare from the city of Tempe and $2.17 million in welfare from the Federal government.
Just what part of Article 2 Section 12 of the Arizona Constitution don't our
royal government rulers in Tempe understand? It says:
No public money or property shall be appropriated for or applied to any religious worship, exercise, or instruction, or to the of any religious establishment.
Source
Tempe neighbors oppose plan for low-income units
by Dianna M. Náñez - May. 30, 2012 09:51 AM
The Republic | azcentral.com
The Tempe City Council is expected to decide Thursday whether to allow an out-of-state developer to bypass height and density rules for a proposed low-income housing complex along the light-rail line.
More than 100 residents from neighborhoods flanking the land oppose Gorman & Co.'s request to build Gracie's Village, a four-story apartment that would replace the single-story Gracie's Thrift Store on Apache Boulevard west of McClintock Drive.
Grace Community Church owns the 2-acre site and is working with the Wisconsin-based developer to build the apartments. Several church members, who do not live near the proposed development, said they support the project because it would serve needy families.
But scores of residents near the proposed Gracie's Village want the developer to stick to the current zoning, which would allow a maximum of 40 units and a building no taller than 35 feet. Gorman is seeking a waiver for 50 units and a 54-foot building with areas that would reach 64 feet for an emergency staircase and elevators.
Nearby property owners have filed a legal protest against the proposal. The protest requires a supermajority 6-1 vote of the council for approval of the zoning amendments.
The proposed development is surrounded by several historic neighborhoods, including Borden Homes, which is nominated for the National Register of Historic Places.
Residents have spent the past year fighting to protect their neighborhood and property values.
Gorman officials have argued that they have scaled back their proposal from an initial plan that called for a six-story building with 75 units. Residents have scoffed at that argument, saying that it is ridiculous for the developer to characterize the new proposal as a compromise when it still does not meet zoning standards.
The developer has argued that the complex is in line with the city's General Plan guidelines and is essential to providing affordable housing for residents who cannot pay typical rental rates in Tempe.
Gorman's Brian Swanton told residents at a recent community meeting that individuals and families earning 40 to 60 percent of the area median income -- about $18,000 to $50,000 per year -- may apply for a rental unit.
Existing older apartments and rental homes in the area, which is close to Arizona State University, already provide affordable rates, said Chuck Buss, a Tempe real-estate agent who lives in the University Heights neighborhood near the proposed apartments.
Buss said he does not oppose low-income or workforce housing. However, he said the council should not grant the developer a waiver to build a towering apartment that would harm existing homeowners.
Residents in the historic Borden Homes neighborhood are worried the project would lower their property values and damage the quaint character of their neighborhood.
"The reason we're digging our heels in on zoning is we didn't want them (Gorman) to get an exception and then set a precedent that every single project ... in the future along Apache would get extra height and extra density," Buss said.
Several areas along the light-rail line east and west of Gracie's Thrift Store are zoned for the density the developer seeks. But the pocket where Gracie's Village would sit was zoned in consideration with the proximity of mature residential communities.
Visits with council members
The fight over the past year has become so heated that residents have begun to question whether city leaders are too focused on appeasing developers.
Gail Martelli, who lives near the proposed complex, said she does not understand why the council would even consider granting an exception for a future project when hundreds of area residents oppose it.
"We're not really asking for that much. We're just asking for them (Gorman) to stay within the current zoning," Martelli said. "How does it help my neighborhood to lower the standards that we set as a community?"
Martelli is among the many residents who worried the added building height will give future residents of the apartment a bird's-eye view into their backyards. "We would lose all our privacy," she said.
Martelli thought it would help council members to visit her house to see firsthand the impact of the development on her place.
Martelli said she appreciated Councilmen Corey Woods and Joel Navarro visiting her and listening to her concerns. She said Councilwomen Onnie Shekerjian, Shana Ellis and Robin Arredondo-Savage declined her offer.
"They said they were nervous about meeting with me at my home on such an emotional issue," Martelli said.
To ease their concerns, Martelli said she offered to pay for an off-duty Tempe police officer to guard the council members during the visit, but the councilwomen would agree only to meet at a city building with staff present.
"I think they really needed to see the situation we're dealing with from our backyard," she said, adding that she accepted the meeting at the city site as it was better than nothing.
Tax-credit application
Residents have been concerned that council members may feel obligated to give the developer what it wants because more than a year ago the city offered financial backing for the project as well as written support to the state for the project.
A Tempe development director sent Gorman a letter stating Tempe would consider providing $300,000 toward the project if it meets standards and is approved by the council.
The developer also had applied for federal low-income housing tax credits, which are allocated by the Arizona Department of Housing. A low-income housing tax credit is a credit against the federal income-tax liability of the developer.
As part of the application for the tax credit, Tempe development officials supplied a form to the state saying that the city would allow 74 apartment units on the site.
"The city basically told the state, months before they even told us about the project, that the developer could ignore the (zoning) standards," Martelli said.
This month, Mayor Hugh Hallman told residents at a council meeting that the form to the state did not obligate the city to approve a waiver for the developer.
"I'd like to believe that's true," Martelli said.
If Gorman builds the project, it is eligible for up to an estimated $2.17 million in federal tax credits, which can be claimed annually for a 10-year period. The property must maintain low-income rent restrictions for at least 30 years.
Kuwait blogger gets 10 years for insulting prophet Mohammed
Source
Kuwait blogger gets 10 years for insulting prophet Mohammed
By Douglas Stanglin, USA TODAY
A Kuwaiti court has sentenced a blogger to 10 years in prison for insulting the prophet Mohammed and for harming Kuwait's interests with disparaging tweets about the regimes in neighboring Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, Gulf News and other media report.
The court convicted Hamad Al-Naqi, 26, of Kuwait, of blasphemy for tweets about the prophet Mohammed, his companions, and his wife, Aisha, in February and March.
Al-Naqi was also accused of posting remarks that "denigrated Islam as a religion, ridiculed its beliefs and teachings and scorned its iconic figures."
The prosecutor told the court that the tweets "were likely to stoke sedition within the community and mobilize segments alongside sectarian lines," Gulf News reports.
Al-Naqi had pleaded not guilty, saying that his Twitter account had been hacked and that he did not post the messages, Reuters reports.
Gulf News also reports that several lawmakers called for his execution.
Gulf News says the Kuwaiti parliament, which is dominated by "Islamist and tribal representatives," has passed an anti-blasphemy draft law that calls for the death penalty for anyone convicted of insulting God, Mohammed, or his companions or relatives.
More articles on mixing government and religion
Check out some more